User talk:452

Your attention, please Splitting conversations makes no sense. -452 (talk)
 * If I leave you a message elsewhere, please reply there, not here
 * If you leave me a message here, I will reply here.

==

Main Page Footer
Hello. I want to add League of Legends to the footer template so we can add it onto ours as well. Thanks!
 * Added :) -User452 22:42, August 31, 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Gaming discussion
Since you are an active editor of the old "Wiki Gaming Footer‎‎" on central, please join the discussion about it's future here. --Sxerks 20:36, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. -User452 00:05, September 24, 2011 (UTC)

Deletion

 * Original message: Hello, why was my userpage deleted? (You did not use a deletion summary) -452 (talk) 17:40, May 7, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Was just due to the use of the IP parser function.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 14:25, May 8, 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay, we can talk here instead.
 * Yes, the page contained the IP parser function, why did you delete the page? -452 (talk) 14:30, May 8, 2014 (UTC)


 * You have again deleted the page, but have still not answered the question. -452 (talk) 21:21, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * There is no single justifiable reason for you to have it on your userpage.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 21:25, June 17, 2014 (UTC)


 * I was not aware that "justifiable reasons" were required in order to have anything on a user page. Could you please point me to the Codex Gamicus policy which states that all user page content must have "justifiable reasons"? -452 (talk) 21:28, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Or, just any User Page policies, because I'd like to read them anyway. -452 (talk) 21:31, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Stop being a smart-ass. All userspace content has to be justified, and there is no sound reason for you to have it there. This isn't a debate, and this isn't up for negotiation.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 21:34, June 17, 2014 (UTC)


 * I am attempting to have a serious, mature, conversation with you, and I ask you to please refrain from further name-calling, as name-calling is hurtful and does not belong on Wiki.
 * I am simply trying to determine exactly why my user page was deleted. The fact that it contained a parser function is factual, but it doesn't explain why it was deleted, unless you're trying to tell me that there is a rule against having parser functions in user pages, which I cannot find.  Having that particular parser function on a high traffic page would be a bad idea, but my user page is a low traffic page, so there isn't an inherent problem with using it there.
 * I have never encountered the concept of "all userspace content has to be justified" before. As far as I'm concerned, "All admin interference in userspace content has to be justified".
 * As an admin, I have always treated user pages as relatively "sovereign" territory, and have only altered user page content when there was a clear breach of policy (hate speech, etc), or there was maintenance required (Red link, broken images, etc).
 * Furthermore, outright deletion of the page is unwarranted, as simply removing the parser function would suffice.
 * This isn't a debate, and this isn't up for negotiation.
 * That statement is another concept which is foreign to me as an admin, as I would never say something like that unless there was a clear breach of the written rules.
 * I did not try to debate you, or negotiate with you, I simply asked you a question. I can justify all of my administrative actions, and always welcome questions about my actions.  (I also welcome all debates and negotiations about rules, because Wiki communities are run by the communities, not by admins.)
 * If your only answer to why you deleted my user page is "because I said so", then I guess that is the end of this discussion, thanks for your time. -452 (talk) 21:53, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * I had no idea that people think 'smart-ass' is a form of name-calling.
 * Or it can be used in a negative way against users, regardless of the traffic of this site.
 * Might want to shop around.
 * A principle I largely subscribe to. This is a rare exception.
 * Which would have left the page looking odd.
 * Policies don't cover everything. This is an extension that's not used elsewhere on Wiki in any significant capacity, and there was no predicting it's use. Deleting the page was the easiest course of action than writing on the talk page for a user who may not even be around anymore.
 * No, but you instigated an argument and attempted to invoke irrelevant counter-arguments. You never supplied a valid reason for it's existence.
 * The official answer is "Because it is deemed as a security risk". The entire extension will be disabled shortly.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 22:10, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you, "Removing IP parser function because it is deemed as a security risk. The entire extension will be disabled shortly." would have made a excellent deletion summary which would have removed any need for this conversation. That's one purpose of summaries, and why I always use them whenever I can. -452 (talk) 22:39, June 17, 2014 (UTC)