Category talk:Pokémon

Hey guys... Egamia needs more Pokemon articles! Let's get at least stub pages up for all 386... if I'm the only Pokemon nerd here, I'd be willing to get them all up, really XD Unfortunately, I have to admit I'm not an expert with wikis and wiki editing. It seems there's a pretty good box for Pokemon stuff, but ideally the articles would have moves learned, learnable TMs/HMs, locations, Pokedex entries, etc. Yeah, it's quite a big project xD Not sure if all that stuff belongs in a template or something, what do you knowledgable people think? --JSC 15:56, 5 August 2006 (PDT)

In case any other big nerds come around who'd want to do Pokémon entries... Currently Bulbasaur is the cookie-cutter for what I'd like to have for all of them. If you need information to fill it all in, you can probably find it on Legendary Pokémon or Bulbapedia. Or Google. --JSC 21:59, 15 August 2006 (PDT)

Any articles are good, but I think we should only have Pokemon articles that actually have information. No pages that are just, "BUTTERFREE IS A POKEMON FROM R/G/B ". Those just clutter up the "random page" button. --Evisruc 22:17, 15 August 2006 (PDT)


 * Hmm, alright... I see what you mean. Should they just be limited to major/notable ones, like starters or legendaries or something? Either way less is good as far as I'm concerned, last thing I really want to do is write 407 articles... XD --JSC
 * I think it should be any, as long as if there's a good amount of information. What I meant is that as long as if they aren't 1 to 3 sentence entries then it's fine.  I would like to hear what everyone else thinks.  --Evisruc 18:40, 16 August 2006 (PDT)

Base Stats vs. Max Stats
From now on, it'd probably be a good idea to use Base Stats in the Battle Specs sections than Max Stats - just a note for anyone that might write some individual Pokemon articles in the future. You can find base stats on the pages listed above. Base Stats are easier numbers to deal with a represent Pokemon stats relatively, no matter what the level of the Pokemon is... it's better for comparisons than "max stats at level 100 with a beneficial nature", especially since the Pokemon's nature is only going to give one of those stats the potential to be max.

Also, I need to get out more. lol. XD --JSC 19:57, 27 November 2006 (PST)