Codex Gamicus:Requests for adminship/pebbleswiki/1

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve as an administrator. Please answer the following four questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * Questions for the candidate


 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I am looking to make small fixes to info boxes that need to be fixed with things like the SNES page and how The hardware info box mite need 3 images for the existing consuls plus the SNS-101. I'm sue I'll encounter more as an admin but for now thats the one I would love to fix because I love to help the online community. One more thing is I am going to fix any thing that I possibly can. I'll be honest and say I'm dyslexic so I Probably won't be making lots and lots of huge new pages but I most likely will make small new pages and ask a friend to help polish it up, but not to get out of work just so I make sure I don't mess some thing up. Also I'm very good at solving problems. I'm Acutely also a waze map Editor. One last thing is I know a little about coding.


 * 2. What do you consider to be your best contributions, and why?
 * A: I consider all of them. I support anyone who try to help anyone on the online community but if I have to pick a few it would have to be all the minor pages like I made the SEGA neptune and the poekmon mini page.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I haven't got into any conflicts with anyone. I have made mistakes in the past but I didn't rely get mad at is when someone changed it.


 * 4. Do you regularly contribute to any other wikis? Are you an administrator or bureaucrat on any of them, or do you have accounts with similar roles on forums, blogs, etc.? Could you provide links, if so?
 * A: I have made a few edits to the nintendo wiki But that isn't really big right now. Now I want to help this wiki.

Other editors may post optional questions for the candidate here.


 * Support


 * Oppose
 * This should not have been made, as per comments on this user's talk page.--TwoTailedFox (talk) 21:53, January 2, 2017 (UTC)


 * Neutral


 * Other comments